La psicología crítica de Ian Parker: análisis de discurso, marxismo trotskista y psicoanálisis lacaniano

Autores/as

  • David Pavón-Cuéllar UMSNH

Palabras clave:

análisis de discurso, Ian Parker, marxismo trotskista, psicoanálisis lacaniano, psicología crítica

Resumen

Al elaborar su psicología crítica, Ian Parker se ubica en tres grandes tradiciones teóricas y metodológicas que se entretejen de manera compleja en el conjunto de su obra: en primer lugar, el análisis de discurso; en segundo lugar, el marxismo, principalmente en su versión trotskista; en tercer lugar, el psicoanálisis, específicamente el psicoanálisis lacaniano. En este artículo se analiza la manera particular en que Parker interpreta estas tradiciones, utilizándolas cuando toma posición en cada una de ellas para fundar sus críticas a la psicología y a la cultura de nuestro tiempo.

Citas

Barthes, R. (1956). Mythologies. París: Seuil, 1970.

Butler, J., Laclau, E. y Žižek, S. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.

Dunker, C. y Parker, I. (2009). “How to be Secretly Lacanian in Anti-Psychoanalytic Qualitative Research”. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 7, 52-71. http://www.discourseunit.com/arcp/7.htm (consultado el 15 de abril 2010).

Edwards, D. y Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Londres: Sage.

Ingleby, D. (1985). “Professionals and socializers: the psy complex”. Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control, 7, 79-109.

Lacan, J. (1965). “Séance du 9 juin 1965”. En: Séminaire 12, Problèmes cruciaux pour la psychanalyse. Inédito.

Parker, I. (1987) “Social Representations: Social psychology’s (mis)use of sociology”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17 (4), 447-69.

Parker, I. (1989) The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology – and how to end it. London: Routledge

Parker, I. (1991) “Psicoanálisis y sociedad: subjetividad y psicología social”. En: N. Correa de Jesús, H. J. Figueroa y M. M. López (eds) Coloquio Internacional sobre el Imaginario Social Contemporáneo (ponencias), pp. 31-40, San Juan: Universidad de Puerto Rico.

Parker, I. (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.

Parker, I. (1994a). “Discourse analysis”. En: Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor,M. y Tindall, C. (eds). Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide [pp. 92-107]. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Parker, I. (1994b). “Reflexive Research and the Grounding of Analysis: Social Psychology and the Psy-complex”. Journal of Community & SocialPsychology, 4, 239-252.

Parker, I. (1995a). “Discursive Complexes in Material Culture”. En: J. Haworth (ed)Psychological Research: Innovative Methods and Strategies [pp. 185-196].London: Routledge.

Parker, I. (1995b). “Everyday behaviour(ism) and therapeutic discourse: Deconstructingthe ego as verbal nucleus in Skinner and Lacan”. En: J. Siegfried (ed)Therapeutic and Everyday Discourse as Behavior Change: Towards a microanalysis in psychotherapy process research [pp. 447-67]. Nueva York: Ablex.

Parker, I. (1996a) “Discurso, Cultura y Poder en la Vida Cotidiana”. En: A. Gordo López y J. L. Linaza (eds) Psicologia, Discurso y Poder: Metodologias cualitativas, perspectivas criticas [pp. 79-92]. Madrid: Visor.

Parker, I. (1996b) “Ernest Mandel 1923-1995”. Changes: An International Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Chichester: Wiley, 14, (1), 77-79

Parker, I. (1996c). “The Revolutionary Psychology of Lev Davidovich Bronstein”. En: I. Parker and R. Spears (eds) Psychology and Society: Radical Theory and Practice [pp. 184-194]. London: Pluto Press.

Parker, I. (1996d). “Postmodernism and its discontents: Therapeutic discourse”. British Journal of Psychotherapy. Londres: Artesian Books, 12, (4), 447-460.

Parker, I. (1996e). “El Regreso de lo Reprimido: Complejos Discursivos y el Complejo-Psi”. En: A. Gordo-López y J. L. Linaza (eds) Psicologia,Discurso y Poder: Metodologías cualitativas, perspectivas críticas [pp. 253-268]. Madrid: Visor.

Parker, I. (1996f). “Psychology, Science Fiction and Postmodern Space”, South African Journal of Psychology, 26, (3), 149-149.

Parker, I. (1997a). “Discursive Psychology”. En: Fox, D. and Prilleltensky, I. (eds) Critical Psychology: An Introduction [pp. 284-298]: Londres: Sage.

Parker, I. (1997b). “Psychology, subjectivity and resistance”. Forum Kritische Psychologie, Berlin: FKP, 38, 136-145

Parker, I. (1997c). “The Unconscious State of Social Psychology”. En: T. Ibáñez and L.Íñiguez (eds) Critical Social Psychology [pp. 157-168]. London: Sage.

Parker, I. (1997d). “Discourse Analysis and Psycho-Analysis”. British Journal of Social Psychology 36, 479-495

Parker, I. (1998a). “Clubbing”. En: Psychoanalytic mythologies [pp. 69-72]. Londres: Anthem, 2009.

Parker, I. (1998b). “Interpersonal skills”. En: Psychoanalytic mythologies [pp. 23-26]. Londres: Anthem, 2009.

Parker, I. (1999a). “Marxism, ideology and psychology”. Theory & Psychology 9, (3), 291-293.

Parker, I. (1999b). “Psychology and Marxism: Dialectical Opposites?”. En: W. Maiers , B. Bayer, B. Duarte Esgalhado, R. Jorna, y E. Schraube (eds), Challenges to Theoretical Psychology [pp. 477-484]. Toronto: Captus University Publications.

Parker, I. (1999c). “Critical psychology: critical links”. Annual Review of Critical Psychology 1, 3-18.

Parker, I. (1999d). “Critical Reflexive Humanism and Critical Constructionist Psychology”. En: D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby (eds), Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice [pp. 23-36]. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Parker, I. (2000a). “Humanismo y Subjetividad en Psicologia”, Revista AVEPSO,Caracas: Asociacion Venezolana de Psicologia Social 22(1), 85-106.

Parker, I. (2000b). “Four Story-Theories About and Against Postmodernism in Psychology”. En: L. Holzman and J. Morss (eds) Postmodern Psychologies: Societal Practice and Political Life [pp. 29-48], Nueva York: Routledge.

Parker, I. (2000c). “Looking for Lacan: virtual psychology’. En K. Malone and S. Friedlander (eds) The Subject of Lacan: A Lacanian Reader for Psychologists [pp. 331-344]. New York: SUNY Press.

Parker, I. (2001a). “Lacan, Psychology and the Discourse of the University”. Psychoanalytic Studies 3(1), 67-77.

Parker, I. (2001b). “Critical Psychology: Excitement and Danger”. International Journal of Critical Psychology 1, 125-127.

Parker, I. (2002). Critical Discursive Psychology. Londres: Palgrave.

Parker, I. (2003a). “Lacanian Social Theory and Clinical Practice”, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 26(2), 51-77.

Parker, I. (2003b). “Therapy versus Lacanian Psychoanalysis”. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 7, 170-172.

Parker, I. (2003c). “Psychoanalytic research: How to locate subjectivity in contemporary culture”. Interações: Estudos Pesquisas em Psicologia 8,13-35.

Parker, I. (2003d). “Jacques Lacan, Barred Psychologist”. Theory & Psychology 13(1), 95-115.

Parker, I. (2004a). Slavoj Žižek: A Critical Introduction. Londres: Pluto.

Parker, I. (2004b). “Psychoanalysis and critical psychology”. En: D. Hook (ed.), Critical Psychology [pp. 138-161]. Cape Town: UCT Press.

Parker, I. (2005a). “Lacanian ethics in psychology: Seven paradigms”. En: Gülerce, A.,Hofmeister, A., Steauble, I., Saunders, G. and Kaye, J. (Eds), Contemporary Theorizing in Psychology: Global Perspectives. Concord: Captus Press Inc.

Parker, I. (2005b). “Lacanian Discourse Analysis in Psychology: Seven Theoretical Elements”. Theory & Psychology 15 (2), 163-182

Parker, I. (2006). “Points of view”. En: Psychoanalytic mythologies [pp. 3-5]. Londres: Anthem, 2009.

Parker, I. (2007a) “Psychology”. En: M. Hartwig (ed), A Dictionary of Critical Realism [pp. 390-391]. Londres: Routledge.

Parker, I. (2007b). “Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Revolutionary Marxism”. Lacanian Ink 29 [pp. 121-139]. Nueva York: Wooster Press.

Parker, I. (2007c). Revolution in Psychology. Alienation to Emancipation. Londres: Pluto.

Parker, I. (2008). “Psychoanalytic Theory and Psychology: Conditions of Possibility for Clinical and Cultural Practice”. Theory & Psychology 18(2), 147-165.

Parker, I. (2009a). “Critical Psychology and Revolutionary Marxism”. Theory & Psychology 19 (1), 71-92.

Parker, I (2009b). “Where professionalisation leads us in practice: Psychotherapy in astate of bad health”. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling 11(2) 211-220.

Parker, I (2009c). Psychoanalytic mythologies. Londres: Anthem.

Parker, I. (2010a). “Asylum: Democratic Psychiatry in 2010”. Socialist Resistance.http://socialistresistance.org/?p=849 (consultado el 12/05/10)

Parker, I. (2010b). “Preface”. En: D. Pavón Cuéllar, From the Conscious Interior to an Exterior Unconscious. Lacan Discourse Analysis and Social Psychology [pp.ix-x]. Londres: Karnac.

Parker, I. y Burman, E. (1993a). “Introduction - discourse analysis: the turn to the text”. En: Burman, E. y Parker, I. (eds) (1993) Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action [pp. 1-13]. Londres: Routledge.

Parker, I. y Burman, E. (1993b). Against discursive imperialism, empiricism and constructionism: thirty-two problems with discourse analysis. En: Burman, E.and Parker, I. (eds) (1993) Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action [pp. 155-172]. Londres: Routledge.

Parker, I. y Shotter, J. (1990). “Introduction”. En: Parker, I. y Shotter, J. (eds) Deconstructing Social Psychology (pp. 1-14). Londres: Routledge.

Potter, J. (1998). “Discursive Social Psychology: From Attitudes to Evaluative Practices”. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233–266.

Potter, J. (2003). “Discourse analysis and discursive psychology”, en P. M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes y L. Yardley (eds.). Qualitative research in Psychology (pp. 73-94). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Potter, J. y Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Londres: Sage.

Rose, N. (1985). The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England 1869-1939. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Descargas

Publicado

2015-05-21

Número

Sección

La psicología crítica de Ian Parker y su relación con el psicoanálisis lacaniano (contribuciones invitadas)